Biodiversity Informatics Horizons 2013 (2)

tweets aggregation of titled conference (http://conference.lifewatch.unisalento.it/index.php/EBIC/BIH2013) for my memo, from 2013-09-05 05:14 JST. see also http://togetter.com/li/559549 for day1-2. tweets were gathered by the hashtag #bih13 , without retweets, and ordered as early tweets came first. not yet decided to update or not, or separate if many tweets.
0
Renzo Kottmann @renzokott

#bih13 session on 'technical environment' starting now :)

2013-09-05 16:01:39
Norman Morrison @morrisonnorman

@AlexHardisty from @bioveleu: an ecosystem of service providers supports specialisation and interoperability #BIH13

2013-09-05 16:21:59
Jacco Konijn @JaccoScience

Go to http://t.co/poScnF7BF5 to register or discover the biodiversity web service you have or need #BIH13

2013-09-05 16:30:44
Norman Morrison @morrisonnorman

@CaroleAnneGoble empirical analysis shows that biodiversity informaticians focus their workflows steps on data retrieval #BIH13

2013-09-05 16:33:44
Dimitris Koureas @DimitrisKoureas

Biodiversity informatics workflows are relatively heavy in data preparation says @CaroleAnneGoble in #bih13

2013-09-05 16:34:06
Dimitris Koureas @DimitrisKoureas

@CaroleAnneGoble: workflows must be preserved and future-proofed the same way biodiversity data have to. #bih13

2013-09-05 16:42:41
Norman Morrison @morrisonnorman

@CaroleAnneGoble Workflows should be credited as if they are commodities #BIH13

2013-09-05 16:42:59
Cyndy Parr @cydparr

@caroleanngoble notes the workflow should go to you, you shouldn't have to go to the workflow #BIH13

2013-09-05 16:45:18
Donat Agosti @myrmoteras

#bih13 workflow4ever, wf as commodities, credit, applications, customization, value chain, wf management system, life cycle, biocodecommons

2013-09-05 16:46:23
Alastair Culham @BotanyRNG

#BIH13 - Credit for work is a consistent theme. Citation needed whether for workflow, tool or species concept. Don't lose the metadata!

2013-09-05 16:56:56
Roderic Page @rdmpage

.@BotanyRNG IMHO "credit" is better presented as "provenance", I care less about giving you credit than knowing where data came from #bih13

2013-09-05 17:09:49
Roderic Page @rdmpage

.@BotanyRNG But by tracking provenance I automatically give you credit (trick is to make my interests align with yours ) #bih13

2013-09-05 17:16:20
Alastair Culham @BotanyRNG

@rdmpage I'm interested in what was done with the data as well as where it came from. Analysis and discussion drive science #BIH13

2013-09-05 17:18:58
Roderic Page @rdmpage

@BotanyRNG Sure, and provenance/citation gives you that. I see them as sides of same coin, but can sell them differently. #bih13

2013-09-05 17:22:54
Roderic Page @rdmpage

.@BotanyRNG Credit is an issue for providers, provenance is an issue for users, and users massively outnumber providers. #bih13

2013-09-05 17:23:39
Roderic Page @rdmpage

Has anyone at #bih13 mentioned Google's #knowledgegraph ? http://t.co/yeezxjBskW Isn't this the sort of thing we'd like to have for biodiv?

2013-09-05 17:24:53
Roderic Page @rdmpage

.@yodacomplex @botanyrng I'm saying always sell idea in terms of benefits to users (and make those benefits also help providers) #bih13

2013-09-05 17:29:28
Alastair Culham @BotanyRNG

@rdmpage I'd use 'provenance' for specimens/samples (where/when) and 'citation' for opinions/papers (who/when) #BIH13

2013-09-05 17:32:33
1 ・・ 10 次へ