A lot of #dddesign going on in Europe these days. twitter.com/mathiasverraes…
2015-09-11 11:45:02Got new Domain-Driven Design workshops coming up in Ossa (Poland), Amsterdam, Brussels, Leuven, Berlin verraes.net/workshops/ #DDDesign
2015-09-11 00:38:12Start the year off right. twitter.com/ddd_eu/status/…
2015-09-15 17:24:53"Building DCI Systems on a DDD Foundation" full day pre-conference workshop with @jcoplien on Jan 27 ow.ly/RJzci
2015-09-15 17:02:22@ericevans0 @mathiasverraes Or at least a lot of stuff called #DDDesign...
2015-09-15 17:27:48@ericevans0 @mathiasverraes So, in one Tweet, what is DDD? That is, what's the unifying underlying principle?
2015-09-16 15:43:45@DTraub @ericevans0 Indistingiishable from OO, rule-based programming, or <fill-in-the-blank>
2015-09-16 21:42:30@mathiasverraes @ericevans0 Easy. Structuring software after operational models people carry in their head to solve problems, using objects.
2015-09-16 21:44:42@jcoplien @mathiasverraes @ericevans0 Do you think objects are a good fit for each model?
2015-09-17 00:50:13@JefClaes @jcoplien @mathiasverraes Objects are versatile, but It's been ages since I've heard anyone claim they're good for everything.
2015-09-17 01:06:03@jcoplien @DTraub I think an explanation of #DDDesign reduced to 140 characters is going to be incomplete to the point of being misleading.
2015-09-17 01:17:37@ericevans0 @pwyczes @mathiasverraes Is it just a collection of disembodied "good things?" I'm looking for the insight or unifying principle
2015-09-18 16:41:12@ericevans0 @JefClaes @mathiasverraes Here, I define object in the sense that Kay used it, in the tradition of cognitive modeling.
2015-09-18 16:45:08@ericevans0 @JefClaes @mathiasverraes Hey — I'm the multi paradigm guy and would never mislead people into thinking objects are a panacea.
2015-09-18 16:46:49@ericevans0 @mathiasverraes I asked is if you could explain the underlying principle in 140 characters. If not, I suspect it's an amalgam.
2015-09-18 16:48:14@ericevans0 @mathiasverraes Is there *anything* that was considered good design practice at the time of the book that is outside DDD?
2015-09-18 18:25:29@egonelbre @ericevans0 @mathiasverraes That's been the holy grail of just about every design method. You find it in SASD, in OO...
2015-09-18 18:26:48@ericevans0 @nkoder @pwyczes @mathiasverraes Or philosophy? Or world model?
2015-09-18 18:36:00@jcoplien @mathiasverraes Yes, lots of stuff! For one thing, in #dddesign I advocated using just one model for analysis, design, etc.
2015-09-18 22:48:06@jcoplien @mathiasverraes The emphasis on multiple specialized models, was in contrast to enterprise modeling and also defacto norms.
2015-09-18 22:51:14@jcoplien @mathiasverraes It might well be an amalgam. I don't see that as a problem if the whole is more than the sum of the parts.
2015-09-18 22:52:28@jcoplien @pwyczes @mathiasverraes Starting from this framing, I think it is hard to get anywhere good.
2015-09-18 22:56:07@jcoplien @pwyczes @mathiasverraes constrained to less than sound bites (140 char), we try to squeeze a 'good thing' and lose the whole.
2015-09-18 22:58:07@jcoplien @mathiasverraes I've thought about trying to explain DDD in a series of tweets. Not a formal definition, but the gist.
2015-09-18 23:16:02