エコサイド（環境破壊）を国際犯罪にStop ECOCIDEと化石燃料不拡散条約という企て その２

Extinction Rebellion : XR Global @ExtinctionR

It's hard to believe the urgent, radical changes we need will come within the current system. And it's hard to believe the system will change. But one thing's for sure: change is coming. Business as usual until collapse? Or rise up and demand a better world? Your choice.

Peter Kalmus @ClimateHuman

Right now, I don't see any politicians with the courage to do this. But as the public gets more and more freaked out by climate disasters, it will take less and less courage on their part. (Real leadership would be recognizing this, selling the public on it, and moving faster)

Peter Kalmus @ClimateHuman

By the way, I am not talking about people voluntarily using less energy and changing their lifestyles. Far from it. Instead I am talking about the clear need for policies that begin prioritizing uses of energy and phasing out fossil fuels in a coordinated and equitable way.

Peter Kalmus @ClimateHuman

Sooner or later, we'll collectively accept this. Until then I'll take heat for saying it, but the reason I do is to save as much future death and suffering as possible. The sooner we collectively accept this the better off we'll all be. This is what "emergency" means!

Peter Kalmus @ClimateHuman

While I too wish this were true, it simply is not. There is a tradeoff between irreversible climate disasters and energy consumption, because the real "carbon budget" that remains is zero. We are obviously *already* at dangerous levels of global heating.

Peter Kalmus @ClimateHuman

Climate experts who suggest that we'll be able to get out of this by basically just building out renewables - that no one will be be forced to use less energy or be inconvenienced in any way - are doing a grave disservice to humanity. And this seems to be most climate experts.

Stephen Barlow @SteB777

@GretaThunberg @amongstwits This is not me trying to complicate things, it is now the position of UN that these crises must be addressed with single solutions. A lot of government and billionaire proposed climate solutions could make the biodiversity crisis worse. un.org/sustainabledev…

Stephen Barlow @SteB777

@GretaThunberg @amongstwits Even worse, none have a plan to address the biodiversity crisis at the same time. "We cannot solve the threats of human-induced climate change and loss of biodiversity in isolation. We either solve both or we solve neither." Sir Robert Watson theguardian.com/commentisfree/…

Greta Thunberg @GretaThunberg

"None of the world's major economies - including the entire G20 - have a climate plan that meets their obligations under the 2015 Paris Agreement" This is of course excluding huge parts of our emissions and aspect of equity. Not even then are we on track. edition.cnn.com/2021/09/15/wor…

Ben See @ClimateBen

There is no doubt in my mind that many in positions of power and influence understand the dire implications of 2C global warming by 2035-2050 and are very likely aware that current policies/systems will fail to protect billions of people adequately, yet still block real change.

XR South West Britain @XRSouthWest

Aw shucks. Ain’t you cute to notice? But seriously, won’t higher oil prices dampen demand and hasten the transition to net zero? That’s a good thing isn’t it? twitter.com/telebusiness/s…