Pere Borrell del Casoの1874の作、「批評からの逸脱」の紹介に始まる騙し絵、遠近法、芸術の本質について。

The Cultural Tutor @culturaltutor

Escaping Criticism, painted by Pere Borrell del Caso in 1874, is a perfect example of the art technique called "trompe-l'œil", an optical illusion where the painter makes a flat surface seem three-dimensional. And it will completely change the way you think of art... pic.twitter.com/384iQoXSpb

拡大

The Cultural Tutor @culturaltutor

The Catalan artist Pere Borrell del Caso (1835-1910) is not particularly famous, but Escaping Criticism has become iconic. It's an example of "trompe-l'œil", French for "deceiving the eye" — an optical illusion which makes a flat surface seem three-dimensional. Like this: pic.twitter.com/ISOYIHvyF7

拡大

The Cultural Tutor @culturaltutor

Borrell del Caso was drawing our attention to the fact that this is what most art does — imitate reality by appearing three-dimensional. The impression of depth is part of what makes something like the Mona Lisa seem realistic. pic.twitter.com/2BKyso6FeD

拡大

The Cultural Tutor @culturaltutor

The Ancient Romans and Greeks did it too, and there's even a famous story about a contest between the famed Greek painters Zeuxis and Parrhasius to see who was best. Zeuxis painted grapes so realistic that birds flew down and tried to eat them. Next was Parrhasius' turn...

The Cultural Tutor @culturaltutor

...Zeuxis came to look at Parrhasius' painting, which was concealed behind a pair of curtains, but when he asked for the curtains to be pulled back it was revealed that they were the painting. Zeuxis had only deceived birds; Parrhasius had deceived a human — he was the winner.

The Cultural Tutor @culturaltutor

It was to this technique that painters in the Italian Renaissance returned, starting with Giotto and culminating in Raphael, Michelangelo, and Leonardo. From the flat, two-dimensional art of the Middle Ages to fully three-dimensional, "realistic" paintings. pic.twitter.com/pEqUyXz7p4

拡大

The Cultural Tutor @culturaltutor

The term "trompe-l'œil", however, usually refers to paintings which not only use perspective and depth, but which serve as genuine optical illusions to trick the viewer. Something like this, painted by Henry Fuseli in 1750, which somehow seems to be totally real. pic.twitter.com/N6bkrtOvGs

拡大

The Cultural Tutor @culturaltutor

It's a technique often used in public art installations or in graffiti, whereby streets and walls are turned into canyons, waves, and windows to far-off places. A delightful visual conceit. pic.twitter.com/lMiDeCCDIi

拡大

The Cultural Tutor @culturaltutor

It was during the Renaissance that artists realised this technique might be useful in architecture. How? Smaller spaces could be turned into larger ones with illusionistic paintings. Like Andrea Mantegna's ceiling at the Ducal Palace in Mantua, from the 1470s. pic.twitter.com/Xz6OW9rs81

拡大

The Cultural Tutor @culturaltutor

This specific technique, called "di sotto in sù" in reference to the fact that it is seen from below, soon became a key part of church decoration. Like Andrea Pozzo's painted vaults at the Jesuit Church in Vienna — this dome is an illusion. pic.twitter.com/L035w7tUx5

拡大

The Cultural Tutor @culturaltutor

An even more striking example might be the fake apse at the Santa Maria presso San Satiro in Milan, painted by Donato Bramante in the 15th century. He turned a flat wall into an additional space, thus making the church feel much larger than it really was. pic.twitter.com/taS0Erq4Gp

拡大

拡大

The Cultural Tutor @culturaltutor

Perhaps what's special about Escaping Criticism, then, is how it uses trompe-l'œil to point out that art, even when it doesn't deceive us quite so directly as Bramante's false apse, is always an illusion of reality. The young boy realises all art is deception, and is set free. pic.twitter.com/KJYz3WCozb

拡大

The Cultural Tutor @culturaltutor

A point made most famously by the Surrealist painter René Magritte. In The Treachery of Images he controversially wrote "this is not a pipe" — because it is a *painting* of a pipe, not the thing itself. As he said, you couldn't smoke it. To call it a pipe would be a lie. pic.twitter.com/87gziOpaN6

拡大

The Cultural Tutor @culturaltutor

An idea explored somewhat more subtly in works like The Human Condition or Not To Be Reproduced, where Magritte plays with the many ways in which art can deceive us. pic.twitter.com/g2j0D1SKLr

拡大

拡大

The Cultural Tutor @culturaltutor

The worlds of Magritte or Borrell del Caso are no less deceptive than, say, the worlds of a highly realistic painter like Albert Bierstadt — it's just that Magritte and Borrell del Caso are confronting the deception head on and breaking the spell of art, for good or for bad. pic.twitter.com/uCnPwToiRI

拡大

The Cultural Tutor @culturaltutor

But not all art, even where depth is implied, attempts to create an illusion of reality. Just consider the great tradition of Chinese landscape painting, where we know we are not looking at "real" mountains; these are poetic evocations of a mountainscape, not the thing itself. pic.twitter.com/StlKVDjC6W

拡大

The Cultural Tutor @culturaltutor

Or, say, in any form of Abstract Art. Whether Piet Mondrian's geometry, Jackson Pollock's splatters, or the abstract tiles of the Pink Mosque in Shiraz. These are artworks of pure colour, shape, and pattern which do not attempt to imitate reality in any direct way. pic.twitter.com/NgfKxVjJKM

拡大

拡大

拡大

The Cultural Tutor @culturaltutor

Perhaps Borrell del Caso was saying something everybody already knows — that art is obviously not the same thing as the real world. It is a short step from the self-consciousness of Escaping Criticism to the conceptual art that has been dividing opinion for about a century now. pic.twitter.com/QfGx8Tg9Pf

拡大

The Cultural Tutor @culturaltutor

Or, maybe, it marks an important realisation — that art is always a trick of some kind. And, more importantly, that the demand for "realistic" art is misplaced and can even be a serious constraint. There would have been no Picasso without that realisation — without that escape. pic.twitter.com/dfRZ4VJwfa

拡大

The Cultural Tutor @culturaltutor

Is Escaping Criticism a profound statement about the nature of art or simply a playful point well made? In the end, only one person can decide: the viewer... pic.twitter.com/RGdHyp6XJq

拡大

Plutarch’s Stepson @PlutarchStepson

@culturaltutor My painting teacher, who passed away a couple years ago, was a master at this. He had paintings in several galleries from NYC to San Fran. Learned a lot from him.

robin @robinsimion

@culturaltutor It's the same in the Sant'Ignazio di Loyola church in Rome. The dome is painted on the ceiling because they run out of money at the time and couldn't afford to build it. I took the photos. pic.twitter.com/0nQbstk0VO

拡大

拡大

bearer of the case @cfaaaaaa

@culturaltutor Kitsch and not really comparable to Duchamp or Megritte academically. Pollack also made the point that despite being abstract that his work was a mirror of the entrapment people feel in the modern world.

Jan Hindrik Knot @janhindrk

@culturaltutor Rembrandt is rumored to have had this picture in the window of his house to deceive passersby. pic.twitter.com/aBkICoY8TR

拡大

Fernando Prieto @ferprietoprado

@culturaltutor The trompe-l’oeil is also a powerful narrative tool pic.twitter.com/ho8jZs3mZt

拡大