ジュリアン・アサンジの主張をめぐる、「科学的ジャーナリズム」の不在とその萌芽(?) #WL_JP
House Judiciary Committee on #WikiLeaks and espionage act, live RT @EFF: http://bit.ly/hXOfHP http://cs.pn/6VVMpi
2010-12-17 00:27:08Courtroom artists struggle with Assange: via @boingboing http://dlvr.it/BWjGq
2010-12-17 00:29:04am i right in thinking that still, nobody has written a clear analysis of assange's legalteam's allegation of improper process by swedes &c?
2010-12-18 00:46:57seems to me there are two separate issues: (a) is he guilty? (b) is he being treated more harshly than someone comparable position?
2010-12-18 00:47:31essentially, i feel disappointed that no newspaper has factchecked the allegations of dodgy legal process he makes here http://bbc.in/hRIQV5
2010-12-18 00:49:00esp since there are 10,197 articles written here http://bit.ly/e582gS can someone, any paper, pls, treblecheck assanges/stephens claims? hmf
2010-12-18 00:50:57@bengoldacre I've not written one thorough analysis piece, no. I have been trying to shed light on the various claims here and on my blog.
2010-12-18 00:51:25.@carlgardner that;s great, but i dont want "a bloke says in a tweet". i want a respected news organisation to fact check and write details.
2010-12-18 00:55:12I agree! | RT @bengoldacre: @carlgardner great, but i dont want "a bloke says in a tweet" i want a respected news organisation to factcheck
2010-12-18 01:06:38also, speculating on whether he raped someone will go nowhere, while examining whether the process has been dubious is legit and achievable
2010-12-18 00:51:52@bengoldacre Yes. Nothing that's happened so far has made me think the process here has been in any way unusual or dubious. #Assange
2010-12-18 00:54:19@bengoldacre Harder to say about Sweden. But there are unreported facts like that Swedish *courts* okayed detaining him http://bit.ly/gWftmD
2010-12-18 00:58:16メモ:なるほど、こんな話が出ているのか。12月2日のAP通信の記事。 http://bit.ly/hoRA1b スウェーデン検察当局は、正式な起訴手続はしていないが、下級裁判所がアサンジの身柄をスウェーデンに移送できるとの法的判断を示している、と。/via 法律家
2010-12-18 13:55:59I agree. It's wrong for people to prejudge this. | RT @bengoldacre: speculating whether #Assange raped someone will go nowhere
2010-12-18 01:00:22@Sukisioux honestly, i dont think any discussion on the internet of whether someone raped someone is gooing to go anywhere good, either side
2010-12-18 00:52:30sorry to go on about this, but no discussion on t'internet about whether someone raped someone, or not, can go anywhere good, on either side
2010-12-18 00:54:13@bengoldacre have an interview with head of Swedish Bar Association coming up on @indoncensorship this afternoon
2010-12-18 00:53:44@mePadraigReidy again, that's ok, but i want a respected news organisation to fact check this and give me the details. it's been long nuf.
2010-12-18 00:55:43please, i will go on dirty protest soon. i want a respected news organisation to fact check assanges/stephens allegtions, and publish detail
2010-12-18 00:56:41@latentexistence i've got other things to do. i write a science column for a hobby. i want to pay some fricking journalists to do this job
2010-12-18 01:03:37@carlgardner is it really true that nobody has done this job yet? i think thst's a frickin scandal for international journalism
2010-12-18 01:04:21@bengoldacre I don't think they have, no. It seems not to have occurred the media that #Assange is doing a great public advocacy job ...
2010-12-18 01:09:26@bengoldacre ... but that there's another, less reported side and perhaps another way of looking at some of his claims #Assange
2010-12-18 01:10:05