ナラティヴプロセスをコンピューティングできるか？Can narrative processes be computed?

Hakushi Hamaoka, PhD @hamaokahlisboa

What the one does is felicitous.

Hakushi Hamaoka, PhD @hamaokahlisboa

One important thing to remember is where the matching between real (things) and words (Kage) takes place does not matter.

Hakushi Hamaoka, PhD @hamaokahlisboa

Likewise, where the sources of words ('Kage' but not yet words) exist does not matter.

Hakushi Hamaoka, PhD @hamaokahlisboa

What matters is that each of us produces meanings out of 'Kage', which is projected from real things, regardless of where meanings are born.

Hakushi Hamaoka, PhD @hamaokahlisboa

Words are really powerful. But, we'd better be careful about seeing words as omnipotent tools which to change things purposefully.

Hakushi Hamaoka, PhD @hamaokahlisboa

I believe that words or language had better not be seen as things/entities/tools as given.

Hakushi Hamaoka, PhD @hamaokahlisboa

Words and language is 'Kage', thus, cumulative consequences of actions men undertook.

Hakushi Hamaoka, PhD @hamaokahlisboa

Interpretation can be done in virtually infinite ways. But, each one voluntarily sets the limits based on each one's sense of reality.

Hakushi Hamaoka, PhD @hamaokahlisboa

The sense of reality is certainly related to every sort of stimuli we continuously receive from the material real things.

Hakushi Hamaoka, PhD @hamaokahlisboa

Not limited to stimuli we 'perceive', 'cognize', 'recognize' or 'understand'

Hakushi Hamaoka, PhD @hamaokahlisboa

Burk's pentad: acts, actors, scene (contexts, circumstances), goals (consequences), agencies (competencies, means by which to achieve goals)

Hakushi Hamaoka, PhD @hamaokahlisboa

Network theory suggests consciousness is global in the brain ln.is/www.kurzweilai… via @kurzweilainews My hypothesis supported :)

M.Ohtani @ergosopher

この世はフラクタル、自己相似という概念を思い出せば、マンデルブロー集合みたく福井銀行-江守HGのようなことが、都銀-某社にも･･･　戦前の鈴木商店を思い出させる位相ではないか。

Hakushi Hamaoka, PhD @hamaokahlisboa

Apprehending a particular property of a particular thing is accompanied by attribution because no one can be sure about one's apprehension

Hakushi Hamaoka, PhD @hamaokahlisboa

only by observation. To be sure, the particular property is understood in relation to other relevant properties, such as, actors

Hakushi Hamaoka, PhD @hamaokahlisboa

who possibly created, brought or used the thing, such actors' competencies, goals or intended performance, and circumstances.

Hakushi Hamaoka, PhD @hamaokahlisboa

In other words, apprehending static material artifacts is enabled by story-like connections comprised of those properties.

Hakushi Hamaoka, PhD @hamaokahlisboa

Theory is metaphor. Metaphor requires narrative. Narrative provides contexts. Good theory enables comparisons between different narratives.

Hakushi Hamaoka, PhD @hamaokahlisboa

The comparisons between different narratives provide one with a kind of revealing moment at which one understands reality better.

Hakushi Hamaoka, PhD @hamaokahlisboa

Saying that we constitute part of nature never allows us to see how.

Hakushi Hamaoka, PhD @hamaokahlisboa

Paradoxically, being part of nature is truth but so saying is unethical because such abandons all the gift rendered from nature.

Hakushi Hamaoka, PhD @hamaokahlisboa

A false declaration that one never uses any sign while so declaring :)

Hakushi Hamaoka, PhD @hamaokahlisboa

Appreciating the gift rendered by nature requires us to know better how we are (capable of) using the gift, i.e., signs.

Hakushi Hamaoka, PhD @hamaokahlisboa

［脳に挑む人工知能6］グーグルのAIにみる、コトバと視覚の接点とは ln.is/itpro.nikkeibp… #ITpro

Hakushi Hamaoka, PhD @hamaokahlisboa

Just innumerable repetitions of mimicking by chance induced awareness especially of differences amo.. togetter.com/li/776378#c179…