東京電力福島第一原発事故に結びつけるサイトの記事【カリフォルニア沿岸のアザラシの赤ちゃんの多くが、白血病関連の疾患で死んでいる】を読んで Yurihiranumaさんのツイートまとめ(2015.8.28作成)

The Ghost of Dr Carl Jensen @Cecalli_Helper

@YuriHiranuma then your argument is with @ENENews for headline choices.

Yuri Hiranuma @YuriHiranuma

Yes, I know. I already sent them information. But your tweet clearly mentioned leukemia. @Cecalli_Helper @ENENews

The Ghost of Dr Carl Jensen @Cecalli_Helper

@YuriHiranuma that is not "raw data"

Yuri Hiranuma @YuriHiranuma

Not sure what you mean by "raw data" but that is what the article was referring to. @Cecalli_Helper

The Ghost of Dr Carl Jensen @Cecalli_Helper

@YuriHiranuma sure you do, raw data being initial findings.

The Ghost of Dr Carl Jensen @Cecalli_Helper

seen this? "In the sea, a deadly form of leukemia is catching" sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/… @YuriHiranuma

Yuri Hiranuma @YuriHiranuma

If you mean the necropsy data, I haven't seen it. I don't know it's been released. @Cecalli_Helper

Yuri Hiranuma @YuriHiranuma

But this has nothing to do with the data released on those baby seals. They do NOT list leukemia as a cause of death. @Cecalli_Helper

Yuri Hiranuma @YuriHiranuma

何やねん、ホンマ。

Yuri Hiranuma @YuriHiranuma

「生データ見せろ」の問題じゃないでしょ。

Yuri Hiranuma @YuriHiranuma

間違っていると、どうして認めないのか。

The Ghost of Dr Carl Jensen @Cecalli_Helper

@YuriHiranuma makes me wonder how the sea otter population is doing if clams have cancer

Yuri Hiranuma @YuriHiranuma

They might have less food to eat, but we are talking about the seal here. I need to go now.　@Cecalli_Helper

Yuri Hiranuma @YuriHiranuma

アザラシの赤ちゃんの死因が実際に白血病であるなら、そう明記されると思います。検査機関も本当の死因は知りたいはず。隠す必要性がない。

Yuri Hiranuma @YuriHiranuma

物事を批判的に見ることは大事で、それは、対立する意見の両方に向けられるべきでもある。 これに関しては、明らかに事実誤認の情報に誘導している。 togetter.com/li/866441 このやり取りでは、論点がすり替えられていく。 twitter.com/YuriHiranuma/s…

Yuri Hiranuma @YuriHiranuma

I am just saying the ENENews article says DIC is a cause, but the article seems to relate it to leukemia inappropriately. @Cecalli_Helper

2015-08-28 13:30:03

Yuri Hiranuma @YuriHiranuma

当局側が隠蔽するのではないか、という疑いは皆無ではないかもしれないけど、カリフォルニアのこの機関がそうするとは考えにくい。一方、該当記事のスタンスが事実を引用しながらも煽り系なのは、これまでの記事や記事タイトルから明らか。そちらに批判的な意見を向けると、なぜ受け入れられないのか。