シオニズム武装組織「自称イスラエル国」を国連から除名（追放）してパレスチナを国連加盟させよう

Rania Khalek @RaniaKhalek

Instead of recognising 'Palestine', countries should withdraw recognition of Israel By Joseph Massad middleeasteye.net/opinion/instea…

Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸 @jacksonhinklle

🚨🇮🇱 DROP A LIKE if you think ISRAEL should be BANNED from the United Nations! pic.twitter.com/L24VOvm00O

Embassy of Japan in Israel @JapanEmb_Israel

צוות שגרירות יפן בישראל מאחל לכל אזרחי ואזרחיות ישראל יום עצמאות 76 שמח! 🇮🇱 #israel76 #YomHaatzmaut pic.twitter.com/3tHs1RGkOk

Richard Medhurst @richimedhurst

My parents worked in United Nations Peacekeeping, they witnessed firsthand how Israel would attack the UN. It is even worse today. These bandits have murdered 190 UN staff in Gaza. No one in history has attacked the UN like this. Israel should be booted from the UN. pic.twitter.com/VozzKU5ljZ

Mohamad Safa @mhdksafa

The UN passed an immediate ceasefire resolution and Israel disobey it. Any country that is no consistent and regular in not abiding by International law & UN resolutions, should indeed be expelled from the UN Shouldn't Israel now be expelled from the UN under international law? pic.twitter.com/X8SMxXpz3n

駐日パレスチナ常駐総代表部 @PalestineEmb

歴史的な瞬間です🇵🇸 スペイン、アイルランド、ノルウェーの皆さん、パレスチナ人の自決権と尊厳を守ってくれてありがとう🇪🇸🇮🇪🇳🇴 jiji.com/sp/article?k=2…

Risu-san @mika_xyz

イスラエルは何もかも無視どころか、国際司法裁判所への反発としてガザを空爆する。 いったいどうすれば彼らは止まるのか。 価値観が違いすぎて理解不能だが、とにかく関心を持ち続けることが大事。読者が関心を失うと、報道機関は発信しなくなる。 RTやコメントだけでも。 bbc.com/japanese/artic…

Elijah J. Magnier 🇪🇺 @ejmalrai

#BreakingNews: Very significant. #Israel's Knesset decided, in its first reading, to "cut all contacts and relationship with @UNRWA and consider this body as a terrorist organisation". The final Israeli criminal aim is to push the Palestinians to leave #Palestine when there will no longer be any source of income or UN humanitarian support. When The United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) were to be considered a "terrorist organisation," the implications on humanitarian and legal levels would be profound and multifaceted. Disruption of Aid and Services: Labeling UNRWA as a terrorist organisation would likely lead to the suspension of its operations. This would disrupt the provision of essential services such as education, healthcare, and food aid to millions of Palestinian refugees. Increased Suffering: The absence of UNRWA's services would exacerbate the humanitarian crisis, increasing suffering among refugees who rely on its support for basic needs. Impact on Refugee Welfare and Education: UNRWA runs hundreds of schools serving over half a million Palestinian children. The closure of these schools would severely impact their education. Healthcare: UNRWA operates numerous health centres providing crucial medical services. Their closure would leave refugees without access to essential healthcare. Social Services: UNRWA provides social services and emergency assistance. Terminating these programs would increase vulnerability and hardship among the refugee population. Increased Burden on Host Countries and Strain on Resources: Host countries like Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria, which already face significant economic and social challenges, would struggle to absorb the additional burden of supporting displaced Palestinians without UNRWA's assistance. Potential for Instability: The sudden withdrawal of UNRWA's support could lead to social unrest and instability in these host countries, which could have broader regional implications. Violation of International Agreements: Labeling UNRWA as a terrorist organisation could be seen as a violation of international agreements and norms, which could damage the credibility and authority of international legal frameworks. Diplomatic Fallout: Such a designation would likely lead to significant diplomatic fallout. Many countries support UNRWA and might oppose the designation, leading to strained relations and potential conflicts within international bodies like the United Nations. Legal Status of Cut-off of Funding: Many countries and international organisations would be legally obligated to cut off funding to UNRWA. This would impede the agency's ability to operate and provide services. Asset Freezes: UNRWA's assets could be frozen, further hampering its operations and leaving it unable to pay staff or suppliers. Challenges to Designation: The designation would likely have numerous legal challenges. These could take years to resolve, and the agency's operations would be in limbo. Arrested or harassed: Staff members could be at risk of arrest or harassment. International legal protections for humanitarian workers could be undermined, discouraging future humanitarian efforts. Accountability and Liability and Increased Scrutiny: UNRWA would face increased scrutiny and accountability demands, which could lead to legal battles over alleged past actions and future operations. Potential for Misuse: The designation could set a dangerous precedent, with humanitarian organisations targeted based on political motives, undermining the impartiality and neutrality necessary for humanitarian work. Broader Impact on Other Humanitarian Organisations: If UNRWA were designated a terrorist organisation, it could set a precedent for other humanitarian organisations to be similarly targeted, potentially disrupting global humanitarian efforts. Chilling Effect: Humanitarian organisations might hesitate to operate in politically sensitive areas, fearing similar designations and the associated risks. Human Rights Violations:  The lack of humanitarian support could lead to increased human rights violations, as vulnerable populations would be left without protection and support. International Condemnation: The designation would likely be widely condemned internationally, with accusations of politicising humanitarian aid and violating human rights principles.

駐日パレスチナ常駐総代表部 @PalestineEmb

イスラエルに餓死させられた、ガザの生後7か月の赤ちゃんです。これが戦争犯罪でないのなら、国際社会は一体何を戦争犯罪と呼ぶのでしょうか？ #StopGazaGenocide‌NOW #IsraelWarCrimes x.com/timesofgaza/st…