What Do URIs Mean Anyway?を巡って

W3C TAGメンバーのJeni Tennisonが情報リソース/非情報リソースURIの区別は望ましいが現実には曖昧なことが多いとしていくつかの解決案を示した投稿について、@iand@ldoddsが議論
0
Jeni Tennison @JeniT@mastodon.me.uk @JeniT

Getting close to completing a blog post on httpRange-14. Bet you can't wait!

2011-07-05 06:56:59
Ian Davis @iand

RT @JeniT Blogged "What Do URIs Mean Anyway?" http://t.co/5r1rVgO <- good stuff but I'm not convinced we need to live with ambiguity

2011-07-06 09:10:38
Ian Davis @iand

@JeniT can't prevent it, but we can detect it just like we detect inconsistencies in owl.

2011-07-06 15:32:39
Jeni Tennison @JeniT@mastodon.me.uk @JeniT

@iand And then? Do you ignore data about URIs that are used in ambiguous ways?

2011-07-06 16:02:13
Ian Davis @iand

@JeniT its up to the consumer. They can ignore all or choose to review their prior knowledge, ie the schema that says there's a conflict

2011-07-06 16:12:39
Leigh Dodds @ldodds

@iand but @jenit was proposing ways to address and avoid ambiguity, from a standpoint of accepting that it will be present

2011-07-06 16:15:37
Leigh Dodds @ldodds

@JeniT one powerful thing about the analogy with link integrity is that we now have services that help avoid that

2011-07-06 16:17:04
Leigh Dodds @ldodds

@JeniT ...we could place *more* effort on creating useful touchstones for well described URIs, and encourage distributed annotation of those

2011-07-06 16:18:06
Ian Davis @iand

@ldodds yeah, I'm not strongly disagreeing with @jenit but want to avoid any suggestion a URI can mean 2 or more things at once

2011-07-06 16:57:12