- a_nightbreed
- 4756
- 0
- 1
- 1
@SchultzTim @yukibunz Many ppl misconstrue my efforts. I'm NOT pro-Nuke. I'm ANTI-DEFAMATION. My cause: the Fuk-rad threat is overblown.
2012-06-03 16:03:59Some ppl Occupy Wall Street. My movement is fighting against mis-information & exaggeration spread by the anti-nuke crowd about FNPP1.
2012-06-03 16:08:55Every mis-informed article/TV report about FNPP1 causes fear. That's THEIR goal. My goal is helping the survivors get back on their feet.
2012-06-03 16:10:49Many anti-nuke folks R right-intentioned but wrong-headed. Their rants R not based on science, but on emotion. They've confused MAIN issue.
2012-06-03 16:13:56For years, they've confused anti-nuke-weapon fears (legitimate) w/ nuke-power (relatively benign but iffy). Legacy from Cold War.
2012-06-03 16:16:18If ppl would sit back & look at all research, they'd realize that the FNPP1 threat, while scary, is manageable.
2012-06-03 16:20:11Today, there is NO NEED to continue beating a dead horse. The economy of E. Japan is suffering due to exaggeration. PLS Stop Hysteria.
2012-06-03 16:22:18先から英語でツィートしてますが、英訳をトライ:沢山の人がオラの努力を勘違いしてるよう。オラが原子力賛成派ではない。オラは風量被害反対派。オラの目的:原発の危険性は大げさにされている。
2012-06-03 16:32:18「Occupy Wall Street」(オウール街を占領せよ)に参加する人もいるように、オラのミッションは「アンチ原発の大勢の人々」による誤報や大げさと戦う事だ。
2012-06-03 16:39:44@DanielKahl You are trying to link promoting nuclear energy with 2 things: helping Tohoku people & Japans national economy. PR strategy?
2012-06-03 16:44:20それぞれの誤報の記事やテレビ取材で恐怖感を扇いでます。それが「原発アンチ派」の目的のようだ。オラの目的は、被災に会った人々を元の生活に戻れるように助ける事だ。
2012-06-03 16:45:21@SchultzTim Wrong. PLS read all my stuff. I do not care about N-Power. I only care about prejudice being caused by mis-infomartion.
2012-06-03 16:48:47「アンチ原発派」の皆さんは厚志はいいかもが、やり方が良くないと思う。科学だけではなく感情に元ついてる行動になってる。結局、二つの議論がごじゃ混ざってる。
2012-06-03 16:58:08I am in a twitter conversation with Daniel Kahl, who is trying to link helping Tohoku survivors with promoting N-energy.
2012-06-03 17:02:04数十年に渡り、「原子爆弾の恐れ」(もっとものお考え)と「原始発電力」(比較的に危険性が低いが疑問点が沢山残っている)を一緒にしているよう。冷戦時代の残りだ。
2012-06-03 17:08:22@DanielKahl Discredit anti nuke movement because they are "emotional"? PR strategy / Misinformation. Your scripts are showing, Daniel.
2012-06-03 17:12:39冷静に研究発表のすべてを考慮すれば、福島原発事故の恐れは、心配が残ってるけれど、アンチ派が騒いでるほどではなさそうだ。なんとか、やり抜くそうだ。
2012-06-03 17:13:08Since we don't any probable cause so far, what we should do for protecting our children is to maximise the probability. RT @DanielKahl:
2012-06-03 17:13:57@DanielKahl You are "calmly" ignoring scientific studies proving direct links between small dose radiation exposure and death. PR strategy.
2012-06-03 17:16:06答えられないからこのようなコメントする? “@DanielKahl: 「アンチ原発派」の皆さんは厚志はいいかもが、やり方が良くないと思う。科学だけではなく感情に元ついてる行動になってる。結局、二つの議論がごじゃ混ざってる。”
2012-06-03 17:16:10未だに、騒ぎ続ける必要がそんなにないと思う。東日本の進歩は大げさのせいで遅れる恐れがある。お願いです。ストップ・ザ・ヒステリア。
2012-06-03 17:17:05@yukibunz ずっと前から研究発表に元ついて、答えてます。もちろん、まだ分からない部分が沢山残っているが、アンチ派や、ええ加減なメディアが騒いでる程ではないのは確か。
2012-06-03 17:21:11@onizochan To optimize safety of kids, all were evacuated from 20km zone & Iitate-Mura long ago. As far as I have seen, they're long gone.
2012-06-03 17:25:55@SchultzTim I ignored them because their PEERS ignored them. If they had a shred of empirical evidence, WHO & CDC would have included them.
2012-06-03 17:27:55@SchultzTim Wish it were simple, ne. But I'm on no one's payroll. I conserve more than others. Don't even own a car. My concern is truth.
2012-06-03 17:30:16