高橋辰夫と小田寛一郎の、twitter上での対話(事情により英語)

高橋辰夫と小田寛一郎の、twitter上での対話(事情により英語)
1
小田 寛一郎 @odakanichiro

@Taxxaka So I'm not musician from the perspective of everyone. But, If I use form of music only I am musician.

2010-11-21 15:27:50
小田 寛一郎 @odakanichiro

@Taxxaka My form of music is determine the length (and quality of change) of time by simple method.

2010-11-21 15:30:58
小田 寛一郎 @odakanichiro

@Taxxaka Sound is always not necessary. But, sound is not unnecessary. Will depend on the method I chose.

2010-11-21 15:31:07
小田 寛一郎 @odakanichiro

@Taxxaka "Musician is time control engineer" It is appropriate definition.

2010-11-21 15:31:26
@Taxxaka

@odakanichiro Thank you for your polite answer. However, Mr. Oda is too praise of my answer.

2010-11-22 12:05:23
@Taxxaka

@odakanichiro However, I like such the omission method. Then, let's make it to the topic of communications as follows.

2010-11-22 12:07:27
@Taxxaka

@odakanichiro I hardly know Mr. Oda. Moreover, the performance of Mr. Oda has not been heard. I'm sorry.

2010-11-22 12:10:34
@Taxxaka

@odakanichiro But, I am recognizing Mr. Oda as an artist . Moreover, I thought you has an awareness of the issues near me.

2010-11-22 12:17:16
@Taxxaka

@odakanichiro It is mysterious, but felt in a natural thing by me.

2010-11-22 12:17:36
@Taxxaka

@odakanichiro There are not necessarily others when the artist tries communications with others because they see the work.

2010-11-22 12:23:29
@Taxxaka

@odakanichiro That is very interesting. Because it is related to an essential meaning of the artistic production. What do you think that?

2010-11-22 12:25:52
小田 寛一郎 @odakanichiro

@Taxxaka Thanks for the reply. I try to think carefully.

2010-11-23 00:33:54
小田 寛一郎 @odakanichiro

I'm sorry, Mr.Taxxaka. I go to bed today. @Taxxaka

2010-11-24 00:41:45
小田 寛一郎 @odakanichiro

@Taxxaka Sure, we know each other's work or performance a little bit. Maybe we don't know each other's work or performance...

2010-11-25 22:19:00
小田 寛一郎 @odakanichiro

@Taxxaka But, I also don't mind that thing. I wonder why...

2010-11-25 22:19:14
小田 寛一郎 @odakanichiro

@Taxxaka Apparently I think, "thought" and "work" are different.

2010-11-25 22:20:01
小田 寛一郎 @odakanichiro

@Taxxaka And, I don't think that "thought" is the origin of the "work". Or, "work" is not representation of "thought".

2010-11-25 22:21:05
小田 寛一郎 @odakanichiro

@Taxxaka I suspect that "thought" is "meta work". (But I have not confidence...)

2010-11-25 22:21:21
小田 寛一郎 @odakanichiro

@Taxxaka I think that "work" is the base or foundations of "thought". "work" drives the "thought". And "thought" drives the "work".

2010-11-25 22:21:41
小田 寛一郎 @odakanichiro

@Taxxaka Also, another one of the base or foundations of "thought" is "word". "word" drives the "thought". And "thought" drives the "word".

2010-11-25 22:21:59
小田 寛一郎 @odakanichiro

@Taxxaka So, we can communication without see each other's work by word.

2010-11-25 22:22:16
小田 寛一郎 @odakanichiro

@Taxxaka We are sharing our thoughts by word, not work. And, we think it's very interesting.

2010-11-25 22:23:35