Reproduced what was happening on the net when the riot broke out (2/3/2021).Dr. Paula R. Curtis made @sachihirayamasachi's 474posts from 3/2/2021 to 10/30/2021 compiled into an Excel sheet.Curtis blocked posts opposed her, so only her supporters appeared
-
karakar90892471
- 2717
- 11
- 0
- 1
-
- いいね！1
The quote is from Dr. Paula R. Curtis. When she gets attacked in the discussion, she blocks people and runs away from the arguments, and I've been blocked as well.
Below are her complaints
Why didn't Dr. Paula R. Curtis block sachi?
Dr. Paula R. Curtis
@paularcurtis
For 6 months East Asia scholars have been harassed by ultranationalists on Twitter. We've received nonstop messages (even threats), while a ringleader insists *we* are harassers. So here's the evidence for how @sachihirayama has targeted @astanley711 & me. docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d… pic.twitter.com/bqXIh0HoqU
2021-08-23 02:42:57
拡大
KARA @KARASAN@zirk.us(Mastodon)
@karakar90892471
for backup pic.twitter.com/NdbsaIgJy6
2023-11-30 18:34:47
拡大
She calls them ultra-nationalists, but they are actually conservatives.
In Japan, over 99% of people support Professor Ramseyer.
Dr. Paula R. Curtis
@paularcurtis
I focused on Amy & me because we've been targeted by this person with particular hostility. These lists of tweets show that she tweeted at or about us 400+ times, combined. This does NOT include replies to her followers, which often occurred several times over on every thread.
2021-08-23 02:42:57Amy Stanley also complained about trolls on her blog.
For some reason, her blog was archived two years ago.
Prof. Amy Stanley may have committed a vandalism anonymousl (troll).
what is vandalism? example of e_wikipwdia about Rameseyer ←click
Mack Ramseyer , not the Prof. at Harvard Univ.
@LAktwndOzCaWxNd
日本軍慰安所経営者の日記のWikiを初めて書き換えてみると言っている。 このよく知られた資料も彼女にとって初めて見るものだったのだろう。 「日記自体は、WW２中にビルマとシンガポールで働いていたパクという名前の韓国の慰安所管理者の日記。 エントリーは、タイトルから始まり、問題だらけです」 pic.twitter.com/7GA87mJkrY
2023-05-02 10:33:05
拡大
Mack Ramseyer , not the Prof. at Harvard Univ.
@LAktwndOzCaWxNd
ツイのタイムスタンプ(7:20 AM - 14 Jun 2022)からWIKIのDiary of a Japanese Military Comfort Station Manager: Revision historyを調べてみる。 やはり匿名で書き換えている。 WikiPediaから転記(Wikiは匿名の編集者にペナルティとしてそのIPアドレスを曝す) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:C… pic.twitter.com/V0Ph89Kuxg
2023-05-02 10:54:29
拡大
Mack Ramseyer , not the Prof. at Harvard Univ.
@LAktwndOzCaWxNd
#AmyStanley Professor of History Northwestern University📷 astanley711@gmail.com twitter.com/astanley711 the IP address indicates an accessing from the vicinity of Univ's The Graduate School, Office of Provost. However, empirically, there is an error of several hundred meters pic.twitter.com/0JIKQK1Rlp
2023-05-02 11:08:42
拡大
拡大
Prof. Amy Stanley also is(was) on the side of suppressing free speech.
(She helped removing her counterpart's article from the Diplomate magazine.)
The worst thing as a university prof. is that she teaches with the wrong material of her own.
“Concerning the Management of Women Traveling to China” by Amy Stanley Dec 9, 2021
Mack Ramseyer , not the Prof. at Harvard Univ.
@LAktwndOzCaWxNd
「支那渡航婦女ノ取扱ニ関スル件」の誤読です。 偶然ではないと思いますが、この有名な資料の誤読を立教大学商学部の吉見義明元教授もしています。 詳しくはジョンお姉さんⅢのNOTE↓を参照ください。 “Concerning the Management of Women Traveling to China”に関する考察 note.com/jononeesan/n/n…
2023-11-29 17:56:04
for example,
③ Stanley argues that "current hiring practices may violate international treaties."
But it says ``If these operators are allowed to arbitrarily recruit, there is a risk of violating international treaties against human trafficking.''
Yoshiaki Yoshimi also made a similar mistake,criticized by many experts
The NYTime article
Stanley's essay aims to generalize an unfounded exception.
This is one of the articles criticizing her essay "on contract".
The professor's case ends here.
Dr. Paula R. Curtis
@paularcurtis
It also does not include her constant retweeting of her followers when they agree with her or take similar actions to her, like screencapping our media, professional profiles, linking to our pages/tweets, contacting employers, etc. These would triple or even quadruple the number.
2021-08-23 02:42:57
Dr. Paula R. Curtis
@paularcurtis
One of the things that you'll notice as you peruse these links is that there is a cycle--she will obsessively tweet about us for several days, then stop, get obsessed with some other person or company that slights her, but inevitably return & begin to recycle old material.
2021-08-23 02:42:58
Dr. Paula R. Curtis
@paularcurtis
The purpose of this is to keep followers angry. To keep them coming at us. To keep anger towards us and hot button issues constant. To generate an *image* of the ultranationalists as victims who are under constant attack for their misinformed views.
2021-08-23 02:42:58
Dr. Paula R. Curtis
@paularcurtis
The claims that we are harassing her come with screencaps that are months old, when we haven't interacted with or talked about her since then. But the *idea* that we do is being used strategically. Claims that they are perpetual victims justify this behavior to them & each other.
2021-08-23 02:42:58
Dr. Paula R. Curtis
@paularcurtis
Make no mistake, this is about attention, not history. This is about personal vendettas, not actual injury. This person & her followers are desperate for relevance, and thus have to constantly stir the pot. The logical fallacies are too many to count. The goalposts always moving.
2021-08-23 02:42:59
Dr. Paula R. Curtis
@paularcurtis
It doesn't matter how many times we put forth the facts--the do not read them. It does not matter how many times we tell them their arguments are bad faith--they do not acknowledge that. It does not serve them to undercut themselves with reality.
2021-08-23 02:42:59