2010/9/17 designing for "delight"

any evidence(data) that designing for "delight" is a valuable and worthwhile goal?
0
前へ 1 ・・ 3 4
Jared Spool @jmspool

@rhjr Zipcar, Netflix, Cirque du Soleil, Disney, ThinkGeek, CD Baby...

2010-09-18 07:09:56
Robert Hoekman Jr @rhjr

@jmspool Many customer service interactions are for positive purposes. Call, buy, receive. Call, sign up, get.

2010-09-18 07:11:54
Robert Hoekman Jr @rhjr

@jmspool Many customer service interactions are for positive purposes. Call, buy, receive. Call, sign up, get.

2010-09-18 07:11:54
Robert Hoekman Jr @rhjr

@jmspool Give me one specific example of a delightful design/aspect from one of those companies and how it improved their rep & loyalty.

2010-09-18 07:13:57
Robert Hoekman Jr @rhjr

@jmspool Give me one specific example of a delightful design/aspect from one of those companies and how it improved their rep & loyalty.

2010-09-18 07:13:57
Robert Hoekman Jr @rhjr

@pboersma @jmspool Interesting. Not because of delight, but because of how good writing improves the UX. Delight is cumulative.

2010-09-18 07:23:17
Robert Hoekman Jr @rhjr

@pboersma @jmspool Interesting. Not because of delight, but because of how good writing improves the UX. Delight is cumulative.

2010-09-18 07:23:17
Robert Hoekman Jr @rhjr

@putorti @jmspool They have high usability, but what makes them delightful? What's so special that its *more* than a strongly usable design?

2010-09-18 07:31:57
Robert Hoekman Jr @rhjr

@putorti @jmspool They have high usability, but what makes them delightful? What's so special that its *more* than a strongly usable design?

2010-09-18 07:31:57
前へ 1 ・・ 3 4