@daveixd For you, my thoughts on researching and testing SxD: http://bit.ly/dO8iN9
2010-11-29 22:53:26I hate the term "social interaction design" although I guess I should be grateful it's not "social media design."
2010-12-01 02:55:40@odannyboy Why do you hate the term social interaction design? If not that, then what's better?
2010-12-01 03:08:49@brynn It implies most interaction design isn't social. But I can't think of anything better, aside from just, well, "interaction design."
2010-12-01 03:16:28@odannyboy Yeah, true! Did "interaction design" originally come from human-computer interaction, though? That field was not very social.
2010-12-01 03:17:41@brynn No, HCI came out of Computer Science departments. IxD came out of industrial and visual design, although steals heavily from HCI.
2010-12-01 03:22:49@odannyboy Well, there is still the question of what you're interacting with. Website elements? People? Groups?
2010-12-01 03:24:58@odannyboy My current work is mostly website interactions. There is a social element but I can't apply the same known ixd priciples for that
2010-12-01 03:26:49@odannyboy Either way, your point is a good one. What's a better term to use than sxd or ixd, then?
2010-12-01 03:27:26@brynn This is a long discussion. I cover it briefly in chapter one of my book.
2010-12-01 03:28:10@brynn Interaction design is the term I'd use for designing transactions between humans. Ch. 1 has details: http://is.gd/i0nV6 (pdf)
2010-12-01 04:01:52@noriyo Not entirely accurate. For some people, all interaction design IS social, so it's a redundancy.
2010-12-01 04:51:55.@odannyboy Right. Thanks for your reply QT: Not entirely accurate. For some people, all interaction design IS social, so it's a redundancy
2010-12-01 04:55:10@usableinterface Randolph and I have a love-agitator relationship.
2010-12-01 05:10:09.@brynn Your point is good. I think SxD is complex and researching it and evaluating it are also complex. SxD maybe not for newbies.
2010-12-01 07:16:29@odannyboy @inkblurt Got a better name for it? I'm open.
2010-12-01 09:09:18@danachis @inkblurt I don't, although there are those who say all interaction design is inherently social, so "interaction design" suffices.
2010-12-01 09:15:14@odannyboy @inkblurt I'm sort of feeling like this labeling is temporary, for the very reasons you cite.
2010-12-01 09:18:44@danachis didn't register with me that you'd used the term in the piece; I just saw @odannyboy's tweet and it resonated. (cont)
2010-12-01 14:29:43@danachis nutshell: feel most who talk about social interaction design make a distinction without a difference (which kinda= your point eh?)
2010-12-01 14:31:42