「なぜ、Wiredはマニングとラモのやりとりを公表しないのか」(ジャーナリストのダン・ギルマー) #wl_jp
Yes RT @dangillmor "Do Wired and WashPost have some explaining to do re WikiLeaks/Manning? Seems so http://bit.ly/fHpzhR see FDL's timeline"
2010-12-24 08:27:42It still amazes me that both Wired and The Washington Post - *news outlets* - have the full Manning/Lamo chats but won't publish them
2010-12-24 08:47:52@ggreenwald Did Manning ever mention in these chats that told 1 of his superiors about some of the stuff that he saw like the Helicopter vid
2010-12-24 09:17:53@splendidhammer I don't know, because Wired and WashPost will only release snippets of the chat and are concealing the rest
2010-12-24 09:28:13@splendidhammer He did talk about how insurgents they had arrested did nothing wrong, but was told to arrest more - see my Manning piece
2010-12-24 09:28:52@dangillmor Absurd. I answered every question he asked me. Anyway, I'm talking to you now. So far, all I'm hearing is that Wired ...
2010-12-24 16:22:08@dangillmor ... has "explaining to do" because you read it on a blog, and because we reported accurately on Manning's arrest.
2010-12-24 16:23:19@josephmenn asynchronous. apparently it's a twitter time violation to have dinner with friends
2010-12-24 16:32:59@dangillmor I'm going to bed. I look forward to hearing about the "holes" you found in our story once you've had a chance to read it
2010-12-24 17:06:18