『エコノミスト』誌がTwitterを使って討論会を実施 ※現在進行中→終了
@TheEconomist I think the real question here is should the West use twitter against Iran? #wdys
2010-10-13 00:05:18I agree with the brazilian diplomatic position towards Iran. Force will only worsen the crises. @TheEconomist: #wdys #iran
2010-10-13 00:06:58First up, the arguments in favour of using force against Iran #wdys
2010-10-13 00:04:21Three rounds of sanctions against Iran have failed. Why should we expect the newly introduced UN sanctions to succeed #wdys #iran
2010-10-13 00:04:29Iran has broken the promises made when it signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty #iran #wdys
2010-10-13 00:04:45Iran a stock of 5% enriched uranium which if made bomb usable would be enough for a at least one bomb #iran # wdys
2010-10-13 00:04:57Inspectors have evidence to suggest that Iran has done warhead development whose purpose can only be to build a nuclear weapon #iran #wdys
2010-10-13 00:05:09#wdys how could US pre-emptively strike Iran over nuke program when Israel refuses to disclose WMD? Israel-Palestine is part of equation
2010-10-13 00:05:57Y should Iran not have nukes but China, US, UK, France should have nukes. This is like the school bullies association @TheEconomist #wdys
2010-10-13 00:05:57If no nukes for one country i.e., Iran then u have to have no news for all. The whole should "west" is neo-colonialist #wdys @TheEconomist
2010-10-13 00:08:32@TheEconomist the solution 2 Iran's nuclear program passes by a nuclear free Middleeast,Israel has nuclear weapons 2.Double standards? #wdys
2010-10-13 00:07:02@TheEconomist #iran #wdys If Iran can't act like an adult, we'll have to take their toys away like a child. (tactically, of course!)
2010-10-13 00:07:05@TheEconomist Why should Pakistan be nuclear and not Iran? #iran #wdys
2010-10-13 00:07:15Iran’s protestations that its nuclear programme is “civilian” and nothing sinister should be regarded as bluster only #iran #wdys
2010-10-13 00:05:25@TheEconomist Iran should not have Nuclear weapons. However, on what basis is it okay for the West to act as world police?!
2010-10-13 00:11:29@TheEconomist no force shouldn.t be used,the truth is Iran won't use its nuclear programme for harmful purpose #wdys
2010-10-13 00:07:15@TheEconomist But then again if we invaded everybody who broke international promises things would be a bit of a mess....#wdys
2010-10-13 00:07:19#wdys The fundamental problem w/ using force against Iran is it raises support 4 the current regime just when fragmentation is appearing
2010-10-13 00:07:24@TheEconomist i dont think using force is a good option to handle this issue, ths will deteriorate the situation more #wdys
2010-10-13 00:08:00No force should be use in Iran without undisputable evidence of presence of nuclear weapons #wdys
2010-10-13 00:08:02Do you find any of these arguments convincing? #wdys
2010-10-13 00:07:25@TheEconomist Do you find any of these arguments convincing? #wdys WHICH?
2010-10-13 00:10:01Convincing for who?RT @TheEconomist: Do you find any of these arguments convincing? #wdys
2010-10-13 00:11:30@TheEconomist #wdys No - these arguments aren't convincing. Use hindsight to see what has resulted from using force to stop Iran's agenda
2010-10-13 00:18:40@TheEconomist convincing enough for a UNSC resolution is the only way I would support using force to stop them #wdys
2010-10-13 00:09:42